On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:14:53AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Jim: From my understanding of the CDDL, only a file that "contains any
> part of the Original Software" must be licensed under the CDDL, there
> are no restrictions (except possibly patents, but I assume that even the
> USPTO won't grant a patent on such a trivial idea) on using methods or
> ideas from OpenSolaris in software that uses other licenses.
> Is that correct?
Hello,
Patch: The patch looks fine and compiles clean.
CDDL: What is the definition of 'part'? IMHO we need a debate how to
work with OpenSolaris ideas and the debate must me done by lawyers,
not by kernel hacker.
Other: sem.c is hard to read - for me. Long functions and a lot of
gotos confusing me. is this only my problem or is it really hard to
understand?
cu
pp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
