RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new Dell BIOS update driver

[<Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 1:52 PM
> To: Salunke, Abhay
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Dmitry Torokhov;
Domsch,
> Matt
> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] dell_rbu: Resubmitting patch for new
Dell
> BIOS update driver
> 
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:59:46PM -0500, Abhay Salunke wrote:
> > +static struct device rbu_device_mono;
> > +static struct device rbu_device_packet;
> > +static struct device rbu_device_cancel;
> 
> You should never create a struct device on the stack.  Lots of bad
> things can happen (including not having a release function for them.)
> 
they are not declared inside any function; can they be on stack?
> Why not just point to the cpu device, or some other platform or system
> device?
> 
Not sure what these devices are for and didn't want to mess with them.> 

Thanks
Abhay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/