Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>There doesn't seem to be any actual lockups, just messages. I will try
>>>disabling the above when I get home this evening. Can't get to the
>>>system right now.
>>
>>i tweaked the softlockup detector in the last patch a bit (to fix
>>false positives under very high loads), might have broken it on SMP.
>
>
> yeah - found a bug that could explain the symptoms on your system.
> Called softlockup_tick() from the global timer interrupt, instead of the
> per-CPU timer interrupt. So on SMP the other CPUs would not see any
> softlockup ticks at all, and would incorrectly report soft lockups.
> This bug is fixed in the -48-36 patch i just uploaded.
>
> Ingo
>
Yes I noticed the softlockup_tick() in some stack traces that I
generated with -48-35 last night. Just downloaded and starting to
compile -48-36. Will report back the results. Also will turn of the
CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_LOCKING_MODE mentioned in your previous mail.
thanks.
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
