On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:04 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > Most people seem happy with 50 or so being a good limit even though many > systems support much longer. 50 characters or 50 bytes? Because in the case of UTF-8, if you do a lot of three byte characters (which require four bites to encode), 50 bytes is very short. -- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [email protected] "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
Attachment:
pgpcLOcZhAd15.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- References:
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: "Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]>
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/04] PCI: use the MCFG table to properly access pci devices (x86-64)
- Next by Date: NFS: NFS3 - page null fill in a short read situation
- Previous by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Next by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Index(es):