On Mer, 2005-06-15 at 22:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > Alexander Fieroch <[email protected]> wrote: > hm, I thought Alan did a driver for the ITE RAID controller? > > I had a driver from ITE in the -mm tree for a while. It still seems to > apply and I think it fixes the compile warnings which you saw: I did but it depends on other fixes to the IDE layer that never got in. The -ac tree, Fedora and various other systems support IT8212, the Linus kernel does not. Please direct any queries with regards to that to the IDE maintainers as I've given up submitting IDE fixes to the base kernel. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Alexander Fieroch <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- References:
- [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Alexander Fieroch <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Alexander Fieroch <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Alexander Fieroch <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- Prev by Date: Re: [resend][PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()
- Next by Date: Shouldn't we be using alloc_skb/kfree_skb in net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c::ip_recent_ctrl ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6.12rc4] PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
- Index(es):
 |