On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 10:28 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:23:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > folks, can you please take this RT stuff of lkml? And with that I
> > > don't mean the highlevel discussions what makes sense, but specific
> > > patches that aren't related to anything near mainline. [...]
> >
> > this is a misconception - there's been a few dozen patches steadily
> > trickling into mainline that were all started in the PREEMPT_RT
> > patchset, so this "RT stuff", both the generic arguments and the details
> > are very much relevant. I wouldnt be doing it if it wasnt relevant to
> > the mainline kernel. The discussions are well concentrated into 2-3
> > subjects so you can plonk those threads if you are not interested.
>
> Then send patches when you think they're ready. Everything directly
> related to PREEPT_RT except the highlevel discussion is defintly offotpic.
> Just create your preempt-rt mailinglist and get interested parties there,
> lkml is for _general_ kernel discussion - even most subsystems that are
> in mainline have their own lists.
I agree, this has to be annoying for people who have no interest in
PREEMPT_RT, and future PREEMPT_RT development is going to have zero
effect on people who don't enable it.
Any volunteers to set a list up?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
