Serge E. Hallyn ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> That's true, of course. Reiner, would any of the integrity measurement
> hooks be moved to a better place than the current LSM hooks? Is there a
> preferred ordering - ie measurement should always happen before the LSM
> modules, or always after? Either of these would of course be clear
> reasons to separate IMA into its own subsystem.
>
> thanks,
> -serge
Originally, IMA was not an LSM. However, when moving to a 2.6 kernel, we
moved it to LSM and have found very easily the current hooks. I don't think
the hook position would change when moving from LSM to non-LSM.
Thanks
Reiner
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
