Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code

* Serge E. Hallyn ([email protected]) wrote:
> Quoting Casey Schaufler ([email protected]):
> > You could, of course, add code to act on the
> > integrity measurements you've made, in which
> > case you could be in conformance with the
> > stated eligibilty requirements.
> 
> :)
> 
> IIUC, another (separately implemented) module - whose
> release I'm anxiously awaiting - will actually basically
> be doing that...

At which point we can consider it for LSM inclusion, so let's wait until
then, ok?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]