Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code

* [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wright ([email protected]):
> > The primary purpose of the hooks is access control.  Some of them, of
> > course, are helpers to keep labels coherent.  IIRC, James objected
> > because the measurement data was simply collected from these hooks.
> 
> Ok, so to be clear, any module which does not directly impose some form
> of access control is not eligible for an LSM?

That's exactly the intention, yes.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: Reiner Sailer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: James Morris <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: RE: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 4 of 5 IMA: module measurement patch
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]