Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:40:12 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
> > 
> > > I think I'd prefer that.
> > > 
> > No problem. Here's a replacement patch nr. 4 : 
> 
> Thanks a lot.  All 4 patches applied to my 2.6.13-pending tree.
> 
Great, thanks, 'twas a pleasure working with you :)

-- 
Jesper


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH][4/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
• Next by thread: [-mm PATCH][3/4] net: signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]