Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c

From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:28:23 +0200 (CEST)

> Fair enough, I'll split it into little bits and submit them one by one 
> with explanations. Not a problem at all.

Thanks a lot Jesper.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: OOPSes in PREEMPT SMP for AMD Opteron Dual-Core with Memhole Mapping (non tainted kernel)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH] signed vs unsigned cleanup in net/ipv4/raw.c
• Next by thread: lib unwind
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]