Re: PCMCIA still advised as modules?

Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]> wrote:
| At least from 2.6.13 on, it will be much easier if you have the PCMCIA
| "modules" built into the kernel, as you won't need userspace interaction any
| longer (except on old yenta_socket bridges during startup, but that's a
| different story). Therefore, I do not see any drawbacks to having the PCMCIA
| modules built into the kernel.

At least the aha152x_cs module cannot be compiled into the kernel,
the Kconfig file says: depends on m. Does anybody known what the
problem with this driver is?

-- 
Dick Streefland                      ////                      Altium BV
[email protected]           (@ @)          http://www.altium.com
--------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • PCMCIA still advised as modules?
    • From: Steve Snyder <[email protected]>
  • Re: PCMCIA still advised as modules?
    • From: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] 3 of 5 IMA: LSM-based measurement code
• Next by Date: Re: RT : nvidia driver and perhaps others
• Previous by thread: Re: PCMCIA still advised as modules?
• Next by thread: Bug in error recovery in fs/buffer.c::__block_prepare_write()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]