Re: [PATCH 0/6] files: scalable fd management (V4)

[Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:03:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > tiobench on a 4-way ppc64 system :
> >                                          (lockfree)
> >  Test            2.6.10-vanilla  Stdev   2.6.10-fd       Stdev
> >  -------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Seqread         1428            32.47   1475.0          29.11
> >  Randread        1469.2          17.27   1599.6          35.95
> >  Seqwrite        262.06          9.31    246.8           30.94
> >  Randwrite       548.38          12.49   521.4           61.98
> 
> We don't seem to have gained anything?

Look at the read numbers - lockfree is statistically better. The
write numbers varied just too much to mean anything. Besides, this
is on ppc64, with LL/SC type of lock. Here are the x86 numbers -

tiobench on a 4(8)-way (HT) P4 system on ramdisk :
                                                                                
                                        (lockfree)
Test            2.6.10-vanilla  Stdev   2.6.10-fd       Stdev
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seqread         1400.8          11.52   1465.4          34.27
Randread        1594            8.86    2397.2          29.21
Seqwrite        242.72          3.47    238.46          6.53
Randwrite       445.74          9.15    446.4           9.75

The performance improvement is very significant.
We are getting killed by the cacheline bouncing of the files_struct
lock here. Writes on ramdisk (ext2) seems to vary just too
much to get any meaningful number.

Also, With Tridge's thread_perf test on a 4(8)-way (HT) P4 xeon system :
                                                                                
2.6.12-rc5-vanilla :
                                                                                
Running test 'readwrite' with 8 tasks
Threads     0.34 +/- 0.01 seconds
Processes   0.16 +/- 0.00 seconds
                                                                                
2.6.12-rc5-fd :
                                                                                
Running test 'readwrite' with 8 tasks
Threads     0.17 +/- 0.02 seconds
Processes   0.17 +/- 0.02 seconds

Thanks
Dipankar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/