On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:53, Alexander Gretencord wrote: > Hi, > > [1] With swappiness = 60 I either get swap hell (2.6.10) or the oom killer > kicks in (2.6.11.11) > > [2] I upgraded to 2.6.11.11 from 2.6.8.1 yesterday and tried to compile > something. After some time I come back and the compile has aborted because > the oom killer killed the compiler process. There is no additional use of > swap space (although some applications that were also running could have > been swapped out). There was a similar bugreport with this behaviour some > time ago for 2.6.11.8 but that one included a swappiness value of 0, i got > 60. > I have 512MB of RAM and another 512MB of swap. Try the mapped watermark patch from -ck on 2.6.11* http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-ck10/patches/mapped_watermark3.diff Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgpwkm2c32sAj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- From: Alexander Gretencord <[email protected]>
- Re: Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- References:
- Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- From: Alexander Gretencord <[email protected]>
- Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] net: fix sparse warning (plain int as NULL)
- Next by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Previous by thread: Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- Next by thread: Re: Swapping in 2.6.10 and 2.6.11.11 on a desktop system
- Index(es):