On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 [email protected] wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:48:56 PDT, Daniel Walker said:
> > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > to make sure the wide context has not been lost: no way is IRQ threading
> > > ever going to be the main or even the preferred mode of operation.
> >
> > That's depressing .. You not ever submitting IRQ threading upstream ?
>
> My reading was "in the same sense that NUMA and cpusets aren't the main or
> preferred mode of operation". But that's just my reading of it - Ingo may
> have meant something else...
I may have miss read it .. The question still stands, because interrupts
in threads is a key feature. Other major features depend on it . If he
doesn't have intentions to submit that up stream than a good percentage of
the rest of the patch isn't going up stream either.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
