Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> I'm not suggesting the separation of the community, I'm suggesting

BTW, though I repeat that this wasn't what I was suggesting, it can
be easily argued that community separation already exists. The fact
of the matter is that few mainstream developers have been "asking"
for RT. And at this point, some seem genuinely worried about its
possible integration.

So one can keep ignoring the reality of the existing clash here,
but it may just be that backing off a little and thinking about it
in less absolute integration terms would help.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
    • From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: mouse still losing sync and thus jumping around
• Next by Date: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
• Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
• Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]