Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> OK. However, should the discussion get to the point where something
> like RTAI-Fusion has realtime versions of system calls that have
> globally-visible side-effects (such as I/O, networking, IPC, ...),
> then the issue of how to get the non-realtime and the realtime variants
> to play nicely with each other will arise.
Maybe so, but this will be a problem for the RT folks, not the
mainstream folks, and that's why I believe this strategy is
likely to be more feasible.
> I was responding to your list of combinations of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, Adeos,
> and Fusion, assuming (probably incorrectly) that you and Kristian were
> looking to compare all the possible combinations. If my assumption is
> incorrect, then my question was irrelevant, and I apologize for the noise.
Sorry, there's only so much we can do. Currently, we are redoing
our earlier tests with what Ingo gave us.
Karim
--
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
