On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 16:26 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote: > Daniel Walker wrote: > > I think this is mistake. Projects that create separation like this are > > begging for the community to reject them. I see this as a design for > > one, instead of design for many mistake. From what I've seen, a project > > would want to do as much clean integration as possible. > > I understand what you're saying, but based on the feedback > PREEMPT_RT has gotten up until now, and now outright suggestions > that the debate is not even relevant to the LKML, I think that > some people are trying to give those interested a hint: integration > with mainline code is NOT on the agenda. I think you're referring to one known flamer and hothead who most people on LKML don't seem to take seriously anymore. I suspect the silent majority does not mind as long as it's not intrusive on the current code base. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc6-git6] Fix large core dumps with a 32-bit off_t
- Next by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Index(es):