Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 16:26 -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > I think this is mistake. Projects that create separation like this are
> > begging for the community to reject them. I see this as a design for
> > one, instead of design for many mistake. From what I've seen, a project
> > would want to do as much clean integration as possible.
> 
> I understand what you're saying, but based on the feedback
> PREEMPT_RT has gotten up until now, and now outright suggestions
> that the debate is not even relevant to the LKML, I think that
> some people are trying to give those interested a hint: integration
> with mainline code is NOT on the agenda.

I think you're referring to one known flamer and hothead who most people
on LKML don't seem to take seriously anymore.  I suspect the silent
majority does not mind as long as it's not intrusive on the current code
base.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux