>Mattias Engdegård wrote:
>
>> If we can design ppoll() any way we like, which seems likely, I would
>> prefer having the timeout given as an absolute timestamp.
>
>Absolute timestamps are messy though. How do you deal with system time
>changes?
Monotonic clocks are there for exactly that, no?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
