Hi Mikael,
I believe its about time for v2.4 to reject such kind of modifications,
they can live outside the mainline repository.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:16:19PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> This set of patches fixes gcc4 problems in the 2.4.31
> kernel's 'core' code. I've been running gcc4-compiled 2.4
> kernels for several months on i386, x86_64, and ppc32, and
> there are currently no known regressions compared to gcc34.
>
> Note: you'll want to use recent gcc-4.0.1 snapshots as
> gcc-4.0.0 is known to be broken.
>
> This set of patches do not include fixes to drivers,
> file systems, or architectures I don't use myself. I
> have a preliminary patch kit for those, but as it
> has received only limited compile testing I'm not
> submitting it unless these core patches are accepted.
>
> The patch set consists of the following 9 parts:
> [1/9] fix incomplete array errors
> [2/9] fix static-vs-nonstatic redefinition errors
> [3/9] fix nested function declaration errors
> [4/9] fix undefined strcpy linkage errors
> [5/9] fix x86_64 acpi assembly error
> [6/9] fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug
> [7/9] fix const function warnings
> [8/9] silence pointer signedness warnings
> [9/9] fix i386 struct_cpy() warnings
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
