Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree

On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:44:04AM +0200, Armin Schindler wrote:
> It didn't follow the development, is devfs now obsolete in kernel?
> If not, these funktions still makes sense.

I'm guessing you missed the [00/22] announcement of this patch?  Please
see that one for links to the issues surrounding this topic.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Armin Schindler <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Armin Schindler <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]