On Mon, 2005-06-13 09:27:41 -0700, Vadim Lobanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-13 11:50:34 -0400, Richard B. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Let's say that "Hacker Jack" just got fired because > > > he was disrupting a project. One needs to find any of > > > his processes where he might be deleting a project > > > tree. Pausing, rather than killing the tasks would > > > allow evidence to be gathered. Basically, I need > > > to set the task(s) priorities to something that > > > will take them out of the run-queue altogether. > > > > ~# pkill -SIGSTOP -U richard > > > > < examine the situation, attach gdb/strace/ltrace/whatever > > > > > If you just want to let'em continue: > > > > ~# pkill -SIGCONG -U richard > > I think that's supposed to be "-SIGCONT" instead. :-) Of course. You passed the test :-> MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Pausing a task
- From: "Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]>
- Re: Pausing a task
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: Pausing a task
- From: Vadim Lobanov <[email protected]>
- Pausing a task
- Prev by Date: Re: udp.c
- Next by Date: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
- Previous by thread: Re: Pausing a task
- Next by thread: [patch] updated inotify.
- Index(es):
 |