On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 22:20 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I am not using APM any more and have no way to test such a change. So,
> can you please do a proper patch with comment and Signed-off-by line and
> send it to Andrew Morton ([email protected]) (and cc lkml, I guess). When I
> see it, I will Ack it to Andrew.
Summary: apm: Prevent double APM resume on Thinkpad X31
This patch causes the ignore_normal_resume flag to be set slightly
earlier, before there is a chance that the apm driver will receive the
normal resume event from the BIOS. (Addresses Debian bug #310865)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hood <[email protected]>
--
Thomas Hood <[email protected]>
--- kernel-source-2.6.11/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c_ORIG 2005-03-02 08:37:47.000000000 +0100
+++ kernel-source-2.6.11/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-06-13 14:59:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -1220,13 +1220,13 @@ static int suspend(int vetoable)
save_processor_state();
err = set_system_power_state(APM_STATE_SUSPEND);
+ ignore_normal_resume = 1;
restore_processor_state();
write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
spin_lock(&i8253_lock);
reinit_timer();
set_time();
- ignore_normal_resume = 1;
spin_unlock(&i8253_lock);
write_sequnlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
