Hello,
So, why BUG(), not just void function?
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 14:24 +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]> writes:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 14:57 +0300, Rommer wrote:
Where used strange function udp_v4_hash?
linux-2.6.11.11, net/ipv4/udp.c:204
static void udp_v4_hash(struct sock *sk)
Since it is "static" the user must be in the same source file (or -
theoretically - any included header).
It's not that simple. It is assigned to the 'hash' field of a struct
If you interpret "called" word-by-word yes. I assumed "used".
proto, which is exported. It could be used from anywhere, but
The the OP has to grep for dereferences for this hash variable and check
if it is (or may be) from the given struct.
Well, that's the virtue of object-orientation: Follow the objects, not
the functions/methods.
hopefully isn't. Something else is supposed to ensure that it is
never called when using the UDP protocol.
Apparently.
Bernd
--
Best regards, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
