Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:45:21PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:17:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > 
> > What's the problem with the sysctl ? If you prefer, I can change the patch
> > to keep the feature enabled by default so that only people aware of the
> > problem have to fix it by hand. But I found it better the other way : people
> > who need the feature enable it by hand.
> 
> Well that's exactly my problem :)
> 
> I reckon it should be off by default because the threat posed by
> this problem is IMHO small compared to some of the other standard
> threats that are applicable to TCP.  Plus this is a well-documented
> feature so we can't be sure that someone somewhere isn't depending
> on it.
> 
> However, if it were off by default then there is very little value
> in providing it at all since the same thing can be achived easily
> through netfilter.

I understand your point of view.

> Anyway, let's leave it to Dave to make the decision.

At least, he has enough elements in his mailbox now :-)

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux