Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes

On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 14:10 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> How about this?  Its the same feature, with an added check in fcntl_dirnotify to
> ensure that only processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN set can tell processes preforming
> the monitored actions to stop.

SIGSTOP is kinda rude I think though..... I mean, how do you suppose you
restart said processes again? manual sysadmin work?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
    • From: Neil Horman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs ADEOS: the numbers, part 1
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch][RFC] fcntl: add ability to stop monitored processes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]