On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 19:01 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I seriously hoped core things > like memory controller in the northbridge or embedded in the cpu would > not risk to generate any starvation. Nforce4 chipsets have some problems that look like DMA starvation too, the RME people claim to have traced it to the SATA controller. http://www.rme-audio.de/english/techinfo/nforce4_tests.htm Basically these all fall under common sense engineering, you don't use buggy/unproved hardware for an RT or any mission critical system. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- References:
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
- Index(es):
 |