On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> x86 is actually a 'worst-case', because it has one of the cheapest CPU
> level cli/sti implementations. Usually it's the hard-local_irq_disable()
> overhead on non-x86 platforms that is a problem. (ARM iirc) So in this
> sense the soft-flag should be a win on most sane architectures.
My original port of this was on ARM , and I didn't notice a massive slow
down, or anything . I imagine it can't be unbearable.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]