Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree

On Sunday 12 June 2005 04:44, Armin Schindler wrote:
> It didn't follow the development, is devfs now obsolete in kernel?
> If not, these funktions still makes sense.
> 
Armin,

>From Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt

What:   devfs
When:   July 2005
Files:  fs/devfs/*, include/linux/devfs_fs*.h and assorted devfs
        function calls throughout the kernel tree
Why:    It has been unmaintained for a number of years, has unfixable
        races, contains a naming policy within the kernel that is
        against the LSB, and can be replaced by using udev.
Who:    Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

This should not a surprise to anyone...

Ed Tomlinson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Armin Schindler <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
  - From: Armin Schindler <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: optional delay after partition detection at boot time
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove devfs_mk_cdev() function from the kernel tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]