Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> 
> Daniel's original patch MADE it optional. Its just that the code is
> apparently more complex looking that way, so its cleaner to do what Ingo
> did.
> 

We need the test coverage too, if there is a problem we're more likly to
find it if everyone runs with it on.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
    • From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.)
• Next by Date: [2.6 patch] MAINTAINERS: document that [email protected] is subscribers-only
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]