Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-2

[Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>]

On Jun 10, 2005, at 05:15:15, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > > do {} while (0)
> > >
> > > , else you are preparing trap for someone.
> >
> > Can you please explain what the difference between these two are?
> > Some compiler version specific thing?
>
> It took me quite some remembering. Problem is that with your macros,
> someone can write
>
>     dyn_tick_reprogram_timer()
>     printk();
>
> [notice missing ; at first line], and still get it compile. If you
> replace {} with do {} while (0), he'll get compile error as he should.

Actually, the real reason is for something like this:

#define myfunc1() {}
#define myfunc2() {}

if (a && b) myfunc1();
else        myfunc2();

This would be translated as:

if (a && b) {};
else        {};

Which would generate a syntax error:
zeus:~ kyle$ gcc -c `y -e .c` -o tmp.o <<'EOF'
> #define myfunc1() {}
> #define myfunc2() {}
> void x() {
>     int a = 0, b = 1;
>     if (a && b) myfunc1();
>     else        myfunc2();
> }
> EOF
/tmp/y.c8F08d.c: In function ‘x’:
/tmp/y.c8F08d.c:4: error: parse error before "else"

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/