Daniel Walker wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Mika Penttil� wrote:
Not with !softirq_preemption, then we take the immediate path and
process soft irqs on irq exit.
My changes aren't used in that case.
Daniel
ok, so maybe the safe way is to enforce threaded softirq with the soft
irq flag.
--Mika
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
