* Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > could you send me the .config you used for the PREEMPT_RT tests? Also,
> > you used -47-08, which was well prior the current round of performance
> > improvements, so you might want to re-run with something like -48-06 or
> > better.
>
> Much to our dislike, we only noticed that we forgot to disable the
> debug options after posting the results :/ So, in all fairness, we
> will be redoing the tests on PREEMPT_RT early next week. [...]
yeah, i suspected something like that - the PREEMPT_RT latency numbers
were so out of whack with anything i've measured on similar boxes. The
debugging features on PREEMPT_RT are powerful but have a high overhead.
could you send me your PREEMPT_RT .config? (whichever version you have
handy) That's the easiest way i can tell you which options to watch out
for.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
