Pascal CHAPPERON <[email protected]> :
[...]
> Sorry, but it does not compile correctly if you define CONFIG_SIS190_NO_DELAY.
The safe choice is to not define it. I did not make it clear enough.
[...]
> I compared sis190_rx_interrupt() in old and new driver, and i tried :
> diff -puN /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/sis190.c sis190.c
> --- /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/sis190.c 2005-06-11 09:16:41.000000000 +0200
> +++ sis190.c 2005-06-11 10:20:01.000000000 +0200
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int sis190_rx_interrupt(struct ne
> rmb();
> status = le32_to_cpu(desc->PSize);
>
> - if (status & OWNbit)
> + if (desc->status & OWNbit)
> break;
>
> if (status & RxCRC) {
Good catch.
[...]
> I also tried without dhcp :
> # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:2F:E9:42:70
> inet addr:10.169.21.20 Bcast:10.169.23.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::211:2fff:fee9:4270/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:59 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:43 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:4148 (4.0 KiB) TX bytes:1806 (1.7 KiB)
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xbeef
>
> ping failed both sides, though RX and TX counters were incremented.
Can you reproduce the tests (dhcp/no dhcp) with the patch linked below and
add a tcpdump -x output taken at the server as an addition to the usual
information ?
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20050611a-2.6.12-rc-sis190-test.patch
If you are in a hurry and have any output, I'll look at it today (~18h).
Thanks.
--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
