Hi,
On 64-bit machines, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK and other mask constants
passed to pci_size() are 64-bit (for example ~0x0fUL). However, pci_size
does comparisons between the u32 arguments and the mask, which will fail
even though any result from pci_size is still just 32-bit.
Changing the mask argument to u32 seems the obvious thing to do, since
all arithmetic in the function is 32-bit and having a larger mask makes
no sense.
This triggered on a PPC64 system here where an adapter (VGA, as it
happened) had a memory region base of 0xfe000000 and a sz of the same,
matching the if (max == maxbase ...) test at the bottom of pci_size
but failing the mask comparison. Quite a corner case which I guess
explains why we haven't seen it until now.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
Index: 2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.orig/drivers/pci/probe.c 2005-06-10 15:09:37.000000000 -0500
+++ 2.6/drivers/pci/probe.c 2005-06-10 15:43:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline unsigned int pci_calc_reso
/*
* Find the extent of a PCI decode..
*/
-static u32 pci_size(u32 base, u32 maxbase, unsigned long mask)
+static u32 pci_size(u32 base, u32 maxbase, u32 mask)
{
u32 size = mask & maxbase; /* Find the significant bits */
if (!size)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
