On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 16:49 +0900, Takashi Ikebe wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10 2005, Takashi Ikebe wrote:
> >
> > This basically needs io priorities to work, so that request allocation
> > is prioritized as well. I didn't actually add request allocation groups
> > in the cfq-ts posted with priority support, however I have some patches
> > from years ago that did so. I'll see if I can find the time to brush
> > those off.
> >
>
> As you and andrew said, basically application based approach seems
> reasonable,
> but I'm so interesting your patch, if you have time, please show me :-)
Take a look at the lock-free ringbuffers in JACK. No point reinventing
the wheel...
I think it's a bit strange that the disk IO issue comes up so often in
these RT discussions, it's something of a red herring, because there's
rarely an RT constraint in getting the data to disk; the RT constraint
is in getting the data from the device to memory.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
