Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64

On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:09 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:

> 1.1.8 segfaulted as well.

Hmm.  This bothers me.

> running fsck.jfs --omit_journal_replay did the trick!  thanks,

Well, at least it got you going again.  :^)

Thanks,
Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
    • From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

• References:
  • fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
    • From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
    • From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
    • From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
    • From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
• Next by Date: Re: Avoiding external fragmentation with a placement policy Version 12
• Previous by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]