Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64

On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:09 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:

> 1.1.8 segfaulted as well.

Hmm.  This bothers me.

> running fsck.jfs --omit_journal_replay did the trick!  thanks,

Well, at least it got you going again.  :^)

Thanks,
Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
  - From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

References:
- fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
  - From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
  - From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
  - From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
  - From: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
Next by Date: Re: Avoiding external fragmentation with a placement policy Version 12
Previous by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
Next by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]