Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:24:50AM -0700, li nux wrote:
> In 2.6 kernels how to assure that on inserting our own
> module, it doesn't throw the warning:
> 
> "unsupported module, tainting kernel"

There's no place in the kernel that produces this message.  Are you
using some odd vendor tree?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
  - From: randy_dunlap <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
  - From: li nux <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/4] UML - use fork instead of clone
Next by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
Previous by thread: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
Next by thread: Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]