Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:24:50AM -0700, li nux wrote:
> In 2.6 kernels how to assure that on inserting our own
> module, it doesn't throw the warning:
> 
> "unsupported module, tainting kernel"

There's no place in the kernel that produces this message.  Are you
using some odd vendor tree?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
    • From: randy_dunlap <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
    • From: li nux <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/4] UML - use fork instead of clone
• Next by Date: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread
• Previous by thread: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6: problem with module tainting the kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]