Re: bug in Real-Time Preemption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Milan Svoboda wrote:

> >  I tried to your program: I couldn't make it fail under PREEMPT_RT. No
> > matter what the termination value for the while loop in the priority 10
> > thread I put in the priority 50 thread printed the same "Dif:".
> > I also put in a global variable, thread_done, which I set in the priority
> > 10 thread after the loop and printed it out along with "Dif:". It was not
> > set. I also tried to add exit(1) at the end of the priority 10 thread...
> > 
> > I see no odd behaviour.
> > 
> > Esben
> > 
> 
> Look at my results:
> 
> I added a flag too.
> 
> under non RT preempt:
> (these results are expected)
> 
> ./a.out
> Flag: 0, Dif:11714
> ./a.out
> Flag: 0, Dif:11678
>
(Flag:0 means the counting thread haven't finished, right?)

This is what I see on PREEMPT_RT 2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-04.

> under full RT preempt:
> ./a.out
> Flag: 1, Dif:582536
> ./a.out
> Flag: 1, Dif:579791
> 
> This shows that thread with bigger priority was
> blocked by the thread with lower priority!
> 

Yes. Odd. Tried on V0.7.48-04 ?

Esben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux