Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick for x86 version 050602-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Christian Hesse <[email protected]> [050604 05:51]:
> On Friday 03 June 2005 19:39, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > > Software suspend still does not work, it hangs on resume. Any ideas what
> > > could be the cause? I've applied these patches on top of 2.6.12-rc5:
> > >
> > > 2.6.12-rc4-ck1
> > > software suspend 2.1.8.10
> > > reiser from 2.6.12-rc5-mm1
> > > ieee802.11 stack and ipw2100 1.1.0
> > > hostap 0.3.7
> > > shfs 0.35
> > > fbsplash 0.9.2-r2
> > > dyn-tick
> >
> > I don't think it's the dyn-tick patch that causes it. Does the
> > resume work properly without the dyn-tick patch?
> 
> I've simply disabled CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ, recompiled the kernel and resume works 
> perfectly.

Weird, it suspend and resume works fine for me. Or worked on my small laptop
until I fried it's mobo few days ago...

> But I found another drawback. ping -f reports lots of these errors (though it 
> still works):
> 
> Warning: time of day goes back (0.122us), taking countermeasures.

I haven't seen this one either. Maybe try the patch I'll post shortly.

Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux