> Wahzuntme! :) Well, I'd be very interested if my patches were to blame, > but I believe Parag said it happened with or without my patches. Yes, he said it happened with plain rc5. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: [email protected] (Parag Warudkar)
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Penance PATCH] PCI: clean up the MSI code a bit
- Next by Date: Has anyone had problems with GCC 4.0 and the kernel?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] new timeofday x86-64 arch specific changes (v. B1)
- Index(es):