On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:54:31AM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> >
> > The issue is, if pci_enable_msix() fails, we want to fall back to MSI,
> > so you need to call pci_enable_msi() for that (after calling
> > pci_disable_msi() before calling pci_enable_msix(), what a mess...)
> >
> > So we still need both functions, and for MSI-X, the logic involved in
> > enabling it is horrible. Let me see if this can be made saner...
>
> Why not make pci_switch_to_msix() (yeah, horrible name) instead?
>
> pci_switch_to_msix(dev)
> {
> pci_disable_msi(dev);
> if (!psi_enable_msix(dev))
> pci_enable_msi(dev);
> }
>
> And it can naturally inform the caller if it failed or not.
Yes, that would work, if you want to go down that path :)
After trying this all out, I'm convinced that we should just stick with
what we have.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
