Re: [PATCH] fix tulip suspend/resume

[Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:11:36PM +0200, Davide Rossetti wrote:
> 
> >Looks OK and also work on my HW.
> >
> >Andrew, can you please take this updated version, it is much cleaner and
> >safer, because it handle the IRQ correctly.
> >
> > 
> >
> >>--- a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c	2005-05-27 22:06:00.000000000 -0400
> >>+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c	2005-06-07 16:34:13.641177456 -0400
> >>@@ -1756,11 +1756,19 @@
> >>{
> >>	struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>
> >>-	if (dev && netif_running (dev) && netif_device_present (dev)) {
> >>-		netif_device_detach (dev);
> >>-		tulip_down (dev);
> >>-		/* pci_power_off(pdev, -1); */
> >>-	}
> >>+	if (!dev)
> >>+		return -EINVAL;
> >>+
> >>+	if (netif_running(dev))
> >>+		tulip_down(dev);
> >>+
> >>+	netif_device_detach(dev);
> >>+	pci_save_state(pdev);
> >>+
> >>+	free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> >>   
> >>
> isn't it safer to swap these last two guys ?? in theory there could be 
> an IRQ betwen pci_save_state() and free_irq()...

Well, so not exactly.  The issue here was that we might access the hardware
while it's:
a.) physically powered down
b.) making a power transition

In this case, the device is still powered on, so there shouldn't be a problem.
However, changing the order shouldn't break anything.  If you think it would
be cleaner this way and someone is willing to confirm that it still works,
then we can change it to the patch below.

Thanks,
Adam

Here's an updated patch:


[PM] fix suspend/resume for tulip based cards

This patch allows the tulip driver to suspend and resume properly.  It was
originally written by Karsten Keil and then modified by Adam Belay.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>

--- a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c	2005-05-27 22:06:00.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c	2005-06-08 21:28:26.111797528 -0400
@@ -1756,11 +1756,19 @@
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	if (dev && netif_running (dev) && netif_device_present (dev)) {
-		netif_device_detach (dev);
-		tulip_down (dev);
-		/* pci_power_off(pdev, -1); */
-	}
+	if (!dev)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (netif_running(dev))
+		tulip_down(dev);
+
+	netif_device_detach(dev);
+	free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
+
+	pci_save_state(pdev);
+	pci_disable_device(pdev);
+	pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1768,15 +1776,26 @@
 static int tulip_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	int retval;
 
-	if (dev && netif_running (dev) && !netif_device_present (dev)) {
-#if 1
-		pci_enable_device (pdev);
-#endif
-		/* pci_power_on(pdev); */
-		tulip_up (dev);
-		netif_device_attach (dev);
+	if (!dev)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
+	pci_restore_state(pdev);
+
+	pci_enable_device(pdev);
+
+	if ((retval = request_irq(dev->irq, &tulip_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, dev->name, dev))) {
+		printk (KERN_ERR "tulip: request_irq failed in resume\n");
+		return retval;
 	}
+
+	netif_device_attach(dev);
+
+	if (netif_running(dev))
+		tulip_up(dev);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/