Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

> Number of folks using ndiswrapper for acx100/acx111
> while acx team needs help on native driver debugging
> worries me.

two things:
	1, Broadcom chipsets lack any kind of driver.
	2, acx100/111 claim that the firm ware is 'easy to find this is a ...
lie... F.ex. d-links drivers come with the drivers embedded in some
file, i was unable to extract it for my neighbur and ended up using
ndiswrapper. There was no choise.

Thus your statement is premature.

-- 
Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system
• Next by Date: Re: race in usbnet.c in full RT
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]