> Number of folks using ndiswrapper for acx100/acx111 > while acx team needs help on native driver debugging > worries me. two things: 1, Broadcom chipsets lack any kind of driver. 2, acx100/111 claim that the firm ware is 'easy to find this is a ... lie... F.ex. d-links drivers come with the drivers embedded in some file, i was unable to extract it for my neighbur and ended up using ndiswrapper. There was no choise. Thus your statement is premature. -- Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
- From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
- Prev by Date: Re: amd64 cdrom access locks system
- Next by Date: Re: race in usbnet.c in full RT
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
- Index(es):