On Wednesday 08 June 2005 04:52, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> > initially caused are now sorted out.
> >
> > I'd like to:
> > - get a patch into the next -mm that unconditionally enables 4KSTACKS
> > - if there won't be new reports of breakages, send a patch to
> > completely remove !4KSTACKS for 2.6.13 or 2.6.14
> >
> > The only drawback is that REISER4_FS does still depend on !4KSTACKS.
> > I told Hans back in March that this has to be changed.
>
> What about ndiswrapper?
> Why is it so important to make this happen unconditionally?
Number of folks using ndiswrapper for acx100/acx111
while acx team needs help on native driver debugging
worries me.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
