On Tue, 7 June 2005 17:31:19 -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > > It doesn't really matter. .rodata isn't actually mapped read-only. > Doing so would break up the large pages used to map the kernel. Can you confirm that for every architecture? Or just i386? Jörn -- There is no worse hell than that provided by the regrets for wasted opportunities. -- Andre-Louis Moreau in Scarabouche - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- References:
- [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: christoph <christoph@scalex86.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: christoph <christoph@scalex86.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
- [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- Prev by Date: Re: PNP parallel&serial ports: module reload fails (2.6.11)?
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Move some more structures into "mostly_readonly"
- Index(es):
![]() |