On Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:21 PM Greg KH wrote:
> However, now that I've messed around with the MSI-X logic in the IB
> driver, I'm thinking that this whole thing is just pointless, and I
> should just drop it and we should stick with the current way of
enabling
> MSI only if the driver wants it. If you look at the logic in the
mthca
> driver you'll see what I mean.
>
>So, anyone else think this is a good idea? Votes for me to just drop
it
>and go back to hacking on the driver core instead?
I vote "no change".
> Oh, and in looking at the drivers/pci/msi.c file, it could use some
> cleanups to make it smaller and a bit less complex. I've also seen
some
> complaints that it is very arch specific (x86 based). But as no other
> arches seem to want to support MSI, I don't really see any need to
split
> it up. Any comments about this?
Agree.
Thanks,
Long
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
