Re: Stable 2.6.x.y kernel series...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In linux.kernel, Frank Sorenson wrote:
>  Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
> > The next hurdle for 2.6.11-stable is to make sure that everything that
> > went into it goes into 2.6.12.  Is there a procedure for that?
> 
>  Other way around.  In order to be accepted into -stable, it needs to
>  already have been accepted into mainline.  More information at
>  http://kerneltrap.org/node/4827/54751

It doesn't actually say that on the above web page.  I remember it
being discussed, but it isn't on that page (unless I've missed it of
course ;-)

It wouldn't always be appropriate either - a -stable patch might
disable something which has a huge security hole in, wheras that sort
of patch wouldn't get accepted in mainline.

-- 
Nick Craig-Wood <[email protected]> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux