In linux.kernel, you wrote:
> On Gwe, 2005-06-03 at 23:43, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Just wanted to say in public that I think the stable 2.6.x.y kernel
> > series is working out quite well. Kudos to the [email protected] team
> > for a job well done.
>
> Ditto, and its been conservative enough that not only does it stay
> pretty stable (one partition slip-up so far is very good indeed) its
> small enough that most of the add on patches people use aren't breaking
> against it either.
Hearty agreement from me.
The next hurdle for 2.6.11-stable is to make sure that everything that
went into it goes into 2.6.12. Is there a procedure for that?
--
Nick Craig-Wood <[email protected]> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
