Re: [patch 4/5] try2: x86_64: Dont use broadcast shortcut to make it cpu hotplug safe.

[Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:14 -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> plain text document attachment (no_broadcast_ipi.patch)
> Broadcast IPI's provide un-expected behaviour for cpu hotplug. CPU's in offline
> state also end up receiving the IPI. Once the cpus become online
> they receive these stale IPI's which are bad and introduce unexpected
> behaviour. 
> 
> This is easily avoided by not sending a broadcast and addressing just the 
> CPU's in online map.  Doing prelim cycle counts it appears there is no big 
> overhead and numbers seem around 0x3000-0x3900 on an average on x86 and x86_64 
> systems with CPUS running 3G, both for broadcast and mask version of the API's. 
> 
> The shortcuts are useful only for flat mode (where the perf shows no 
> degradation), and in cluster mode, its unicast anyway. Its simpler 
> to just not use broadcast anymore.
With the patch. smp_call_function still has race. It accesses
cpu_online_map twice. First calculate online cpu counter and second,
send the ipi, so it's not atomic. We should do something like this:

Thanks,
Shaohua

--- a/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c	2005-04-26 08:47:08.000000000 +0800
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c	2005-05-31 16:37:10.565141944 +0800
@@ -527,10 +527,13 @@ int smp_call_function (void (*func) (voi
 {
 	struct call_data_struct data;
 	int cpus;
+	cpumask_t mask;
 
 	/* Holding any lock stops cpus from going down. */
 	spin_lock(&call_lock);
-	cpus = num_online_cpus()-1;
+	mask = cpu_online_map;
+	cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), mask);
+	cpus = cpus_weight(mask);
 
 	if (!cpus) {
 		spin_unlock(&call_lock);
@@ -551,7 +554,7 @@ int smp_call_function (void (*func) (voi
 	mb();
 	
 	/* Send a message to all other CPUs and wait for them to respond */
-	send_IPI_allbutself(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
+	send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
 
 	/* Wait for response */
 	while (atomic_read(&data.started) != cpus)
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c	2005-04-12 10:12:16.000000000 +0800
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c	2005-05-31 16:38:07.613469280 +0800
@@ -303,8 +303,11 @@ static void __smp_call_function (void (*
 				int nonatomic, int wait)
 {
 	struct call_data_struct data;
-	int cpus = num_online_cpus()-1;
+	int cpus;
+	cpumask_t mask = cpu_online_map;
 
+	cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), mask);
+	cpus = cpus_weight(mask);
 	if (!cpus)
 		return;
 
@@ -318,7 +321,7 @@ static void __smp_call_function (void (*
 	call_data = &data;
 	wmb();
 	/* Send a message to all other CPUs and wait for them to respond */
-	send_IPI_allbutself(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
+	send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
 
 	/* Wait for response */
 	while (atomic_read(&data.started) != cpus)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/